'Bullying will fail': US loses bid to extend Iran arms embargo | Iran News | Al Jazeera

Published by ALJAZEERA.COM

The United Nations Security Council has resoundingly rejected a US bid to extend a global arms embargo on Iran, with Russian President Vladimir Putin proposing a summit of world leaders to avoid "Confrontation" over a threat by Washington to trigger a return of all UN sanctions on Tehran.

In the Security Council vote on Friday, Washington got support only from the Dominican Republic for its resolution to indefinitely extend the arms embargo on Iran, leaving it far short of the minimum nine "Yes" votes required for adoption.

Russia and China strongly opposed extending the 13-year-ban, which was due to expire on October 18 under a 2015 nuclear deal signed between Iran and six world powers.

Mike Pompeo, the US Secretary of State, announced the defeat of the resolution ahead of a very brief virtual council meeting to reveal the vote.

"The Security Council's failure to act decisively in defense of international peace and security is inexcusable," he said in a statement.

Iran nuclear deal 5 years on: Uncertainty after US withdrawal.

Israel and the six Arab Gulf nations who supported the extension "Know Iran will spread even greater chaos and destruction if the embargo expires", Pompeo said, "But the Security Council chose to ignore them".

"Washington could now follow through on a threat to trigger a return of all UN sanctions on Iran using a provision in the nuclear deal, known as snapback, even though US President Donald Trump had unilaterally abandoned the accord in 2018. On Thursday, the US had circulated to council members a six-page memo outlining why Washington remains a participant" in the nuclear accord and still has the right to use the "Snap back" provision.

In a statement after the vote, US Ambassador to the UN Kelly Craft said: "In the coming days, the United States will follow through on that promise to stop at nothing to extend the arms embargo."

"Any party to the nuclear accord could trigger the"Snap back" provision if Iran is seen to be in violation of the accord.

"The Europeans have expressed some misgivings about conventional weapons going into Iran. But at the end of the day, they say their concern about a nuclear weapon is paramount."

Under the deal, Iran agreed to limits on its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief and other benefits.

Diplomats have said triggering the "Snapback" provision would put the fragile agreement further at risk because Iran would lose a major incentive for limiting its nuclear activities.

Iran's UN Ambassador Majid Takht Ravanchi warned Washington against trying to trigger a return of sanctions.

"Imposition of any sanctions or restrictions on Iran by the Security Council will be met severely by Iran and our options are not limited. And the United States and any entity which may assist it or acquiesce in its illegal behavior will bear the full responsibility," he said in a statement.

Iran fires missile at mock US aircraft carrier during exercise.

Some analysts said they suspect that Washington put forward a hardline draft purposefully, knowing that council members would not be able to accept it.

"The fact is that everybody at the UN believes this [resolution] is just a prelude to a US effort to trigger snapback and sink the Iranian nuclear deal," Richard Gowan, a UN expert at the International Crisis Group, told AFP news agency.

While voting on the US draft resolution was underway, Russia said Putin called for a meeting of leaders of the five permanent members of the Security Council along with Germany and Iran to avoid escalation over US attempts to extend the Iranian arms embargo.

In statement released by the Kremlin, Putin said "The question is urgent", adding that the goal of the videoconference would be "To outline steps to avoid confrontation and exacerbation of the situation in the UN Security Council".